Rest in peace, Terri.

From Lucianne this morning:

Reply 53 - Posted by: stealthy, 3/31/2005 10:25:34 AM
(...) What kind of world is it when a parent is prevented by armed force from giving their dying child a drink of water?

That's the most chilling thought I've heard through this entire ordeal. Think about it. That's what this world has come to .. that's what liberals have done to the world.

Farewell Terri .. you will be remembered.

Dag, yo.

Wow.

Your items on Nancy Soderberg's at-least ambivalence about the successes of President Bush struck a chord with me.

As a Democratic elected official in the 1980s I had a similar response to any of Ronald Reagan's initiatives. I can recall a sinking feeling as the stock market took off in late 1982, worrying that Reagan would get credit. Or being peeved that the Grenada invasion was so successful. Or that Reagan engineered the tax reform that Bill Bradley and Dick Gephardt had staked out. And conversely, when the Iran-contra scandal blew up I was delighted that Reagan would be brought down a peg (although Oliver North pretty much cleaned the clocks of the lawyers and congressional inquisitors in his testimony). The bottom line for us partisan Democrats back then (as now) was that if it was good for Reagan (even if also good for the country) we opposed, belittled, quibbled, nattered and otherwise sought to diminish.

It was only well after Reagan had left office that I began to see how successful and far-reaching his policies actually were. In the 1990s I began to annoy my leftist friends by stating the obvious, that Reagan was the most successful U.S. president since FDR. And it was only a relatively short ideological journey (helped along by Clinton's feckless policies and corruption) to embrace the policies of President Bush that are engendering freedom in places that have known only tyranny.

- Eric Axelson, as quoted by James Taranto.